|
Two more fatalities,one in Rancho Cucamonga,the other near Lancaster
|
|
11-20-2011, 06:22 PM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: Two more fatalities,one in Rancho Cucamonga,the other near Lancaster | |||
|
11-20-2011, 07:15 PM
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Two more fatalities,one in Rancho Cucamonga,the other near Lancaster
(11-20-2011 06:22 PM)TC Smith Wrote:(10-14-2011 07:24 PM)Jaanfo Wrote: ... but it's the sound ... that gets to you... And again, and again and again again. It never leaves you. I was involved in 7 over my career.... V SLOCONDR V SLOCONDR |
|||
|
11-20-2011, 08:55 PM
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Two more fatalities,one in Rancho Cucamonga,the other near Lancaster
A while back, probably nearly ten years now, a Metrolink engineer acquaintance of mine left Metrolink and returned to Amtrak after hitting his 20th pedestrian. I need to check back and verify the number, even if it was HALF that number, it is bad. LA leads the world in “suicide by train” incidents. I don’t know how the company combats that mentality?
|
|||
|
11-21-2011, 06:11 PM
Post: #14
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Two more fatalities,one in Rancho Cucamonga,the other near Lancaster
Actually Japan leads the world, but since they have a phrase other than one that translates to including "suicide". Since suicide is not in the translation, the accurate numbers usually don't get picked up in basic statistics gathering. IIRC it translates to "human accidents"
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help




![[-]](images/collapse.gif)